Copy of Presentation for Comments

Posted by Paul Kern and Chris Shartrand on September 16, 2015

Copy of Presentation for Comments


Paul Kern and Chris Shartrand

03 00 AM ,Wed, Sep 16 2015

Background Knowledge

  • Aluminum Alloy consisting of Zinc, Magnesium, Copper, Iron, Silicon, Manganese, Chromium, Zirconium, and Titanium.
  • During processing it is common for μm-sized particles to become ingrained in the matrix
  • Deformation can cause particles to become cracked or detached
  • Cracks combined with stress can lead to failure in the alloy

A Cracked Particle

Importance

  • AA7075 is commonly used in the construction of airframes
  • Product failure = Costly
  • Improved modeling can lead to prediction of microstructures that have a higher probability of cracking.
  • Quantification of product quality.

The Microstructure

  • Particles are very stiff
  • Tend to cluster and form “stringers” along the direction of the roll
  • Use Pair Correlation Functions (PCF) to quantify probability of finding another cluster from a given point A sample image of the PCF from the rolling plane

Microstructure Property

  • Fatigue Indicator Parameters (FIP) are used to quantify damage
  • We will use the Fatemi-Socie FIP: $FIP_{FS} = \frac{\gamma}{2} ( 1 + k\frac{\sigma}{\sigma_y} )$
  • An elastic-plastic constitutive model must be defined
  • We are using a linear-elastic model for the stiff particles with: Young’s Modulus of 169 GPa and Poisson Ratio of 0.3
  • Investigating the non-local averaged FIP surrounding the particles
  • Averaging volume of ~5% particle volume will be used

Simulation

3D-Simulation of Particles

Two-Point Statistics

Two Point Statistics

Print

Back