Phase Field Models of Ternary Eutectoid Alloys (Presentation 1)


Almambet Iskakov, Robert Pienta

12 00 AM ,Mon, Sep 14 2015

Background

  • Directional Solidification of Al, Ag, Cu Eutectic Alloy
  • Control structure during solidification process
  • Align phases/structures parallel to growth direction
  • Achieve desired material properties

2D-DS

3D-DS

Phase-Field Simulation: Solidification

  • Solidification Model:
    • Simulate growth of phases
    • Thermodynamic model
    • Concentration model
    • Three phase metal
    • Varied Parameters: Temperature Gradient and Gradient Velocity

Boundary-Conditions

Directional Solidification Visual

simulation-slices

lamellae

Phases evolve parallel to growth direction.

Binary Phase Diagram

Binary Phases

  • Eutectic mixture:
    • Liquid transforms into two different phases
    • Lowest melting/freezing temperature

ternary-diagram

  • In this Al, Ag, Cu alloy, the eutectic ratios by mole fraction at 773.6K:
    • 18% Ag (25% experimental)
    • 69% Al (62% experimental)
    • 13% Cu (14% experimental)

Simulated Microtstructure

colored-phases

  • A cross-section of solidified material close to solidification front
  • Most continuous phase: Al
  • Chained brick-like structure: Al2Cu and Ag2Al

Common Microstructure Patterns

ms-patterns

The Data

  • More than 20 simulations
    • Resolution from 200x200 to over 2000x2000
    • Simulated with varied solidification velocities
    • Varied volume-fractions of Al, Ag2Al, and Al2Cu
    • Plenty of measurements!
      • An 800x800x4256 sample has 2.72 billion data points
        • This simulation took 16 hours on 13700 cores!

Simulation in action

Al = Green, Ag2Al = Orange, and Al2Cu = Blue

Extracting Features

We have already started generating spatial statistics (correlations) for our data

Correlations

0 = Al, 1 = Ag2Al, and 3 = Al2Cu

Distance-varying Distributions

  • The simulated microstructures vary through the course of each simulation
  • We can sample the approximate steady-state, solidified structure at various times,
    • using the difference between successive spatial statistics
    • or just using one of the last time/height steps (assuming that the simulation was run until a steady state was reached)
  • We may later consider the changes in spatial statistics over time to help mine the Process-Structure linkages

Computational Plans

Next Steps

  • Use dimensionality reduction (DR) over our large space of spatial statistics:
    • Conventional PCA
    • Newer low-rank approximation DR techniques
    • (possibly) Attempt to use locality sensitive hashing
  • Model the relationship between our simulated solidification processes
    • linear model (regression)
      • interpretable
      • simple model, unlikely that Eutectoid Al has linear structural relationships
    • nonlinear model (kernel methods)
      • less interpretable
      • complex model, can model complex relationships

Questions & Comments

Print

Back